Skip to main content
StudioBE

Why do we have too many projects?

Organizations accumulate too many projects because intake has no capacity check and no one holds the decision right to say no or not yet.

By StudioBEPublished Last reviewed

Organizations end up with too many projects because new work enters through many doors, nobody compares each request to available capacity, and no single role holds the authority to say no or not yet. Every request that gets a polite yes becomes an active initiative, and the count only goes up.

Where does the overload come from?

Three sources are common. Executives sponsor work directly with the teams they know, bypassing any portfolio view. Compliance and mandate work arrives with a deadline attached and is added on top of the plan rather than in place of something. And finished projects are rarely formally closed, so the active list carries work that is nearly done and going nowhere.

None of those are bad intentions. They are the natural result of an intake process with no capacity check, which is the problem the Align practice of PPM4Agile exists to fix.

Why does it matter?

Work-in-progress at the portfolio level behaves the same way it does on a team board. Every initiative started before another one finishes adds context switching, dependency waits, and status overhead. Throughput drops while everyone gets busier, which is exactly the pattern leaders describe when they say the organization is working hard but nothing ships.

What changes it?

  • One intake door, so every request is visible in one place.
  • A ranked backlog of outcomes that the executive team owns together.
  • A capacity number per team that the plan is not allowed to exceed, which Focus checks before an approved initiative is planned.
  • A named decision right for deferrals, usually the portfolio lead with executive sponsorship, so no is a legitimate answer.
  • A value review that retires initiatives as deliberately as it starts them.

What is the first step?

Count the active initiatives honestly, including the ones sponsored informally, and put them on one board next to the capacity that exists to deliver them. The gap is usually large enough to end the argument. A 60-minute Portfolio Clarity Session is where to start: a structured set of questions that ends with what fits next. Building that picture out properly, and the cadence that keeps it honest, is the work of a PPM4Agile implementation.

  • GuidePortfolio

    What is agile portfolio management?

    Agile portfolio management decides, funds, and adjusts initiatives on a steady cadence using real capacity and outcomes instead of an annual plan.

    Reviewed 3 min read

  • GuideOutcomes

    Scale vs sustain vs retire, explained

    Scale, sustain, or retire is the three-way decision a value review must end in: expand the investment, keep it as it is, or stop it and recover capacity.

    Reviewed 7 min read

Next step

Put this to work in your leadership & pmo practice

Got a version of this question that is specific to your organization? To work through it with Eric, start with the Portfolio Clarity Session.